So let’s talk a little about this freedom they’re always going on about. Or, to paraphrase Lenin, the libertarian’s ultimate nemesis: freedom for who to do what?
Most American adults spend about half their waking hours at a job. And during that time, libertarians do not give a flying fuck about your liberty. Instead, they condone the most brutal of tyrannies all in the name of a private employer’s freedom.
Racial discrimination, verbal abuse, random drug testing, body-searches, sexual harassment, illegal termination, email monitoring, union busting, even withholding piss-breaks–ask any libertarian how they feel about workplace unfreedom and they’ll tell you: “Hey man, if you don’t like it, you have the freedom to get another job.” If folks are hiring. But with four-and-a-half applicants for every job, they’re probably not.
Here’s another thing libertarians always forget to mention: a free-market capitalist society has never and by definition can never lead to full-employment. It has to be made to by—you guessed it—the Nanny State. Free market capitalism actually requires a huge mass of the unemployed—it’s not just a side effect.
And make no mistake: corporate America loves a high unemployment rate.
When most everyone has a job, workers are less likely to take shit. They do nutty things like join unions, demand better wages and refuse to work off-the-clock. They start to stand up to real power: not to the EPA, and not the King of England, but to their bosses.
But with a real unemployment rate close to 20 percent, that ain’t happening. Well, fuck. Better sign up for that Big Government welfare state they’re always whining about. Hey, don’t worry. You could always sell a little crack and turn a few tricks. Libertarians totally support that.
After all, that’s your freedom, dude!
"More from Connor Kilpatrick on libertarianism. The truthbombs, they are frequent, and crippling in their intensity. (via andrewtsks)
Seems like a pretty solid argument to me.
The other day I was going back and forth with Jonathan Bradley on the leftist strain of libertarianism that’s considered by some to be akin to left anarchism. For some reason, I decided to do this within the character limits of Tumblr’s comment feature and Jonathan’s Ask box. So one thing I didn’t have room to go into was how I’ve never quite understood the logic behind that strain, which is ostensibly as much about freedom from corporate interests as it is freedom from government intervention. Kilpatrick doesn’t get into this topic exactly, but this bit comes close:
Here’s the real reason libertarians hate the idea. The welfare state is a check against servility towards the rich. A strong welfare state would give us the power to say Fuck You to our bosses—this is the power to say “I’m gonna work odd jobs for twenty hours a week while I work on my driftwood sculptures and play keyboards in my a chillwave band. And I’ll still be able to go to the doctor and make rent.”
If the left strain of libertarianism is pro-freedom from both government and corporate interests, who exactly is in charge of making sure those corporate interests don’t infringe on that freedom? Whether you frame it as libertarianism or anarchy, isn’t an argument for limited government regulation an argument for unlimited corporate control, by default? Which effectively makes it a free market/corporatist/far right position, unless there’s some means of non-governmental corporate regulation that I’m not aware of.
Just a quick note: I am running for graduate student representative to the Executive Committee of the Association...
Nicola Samori (b. 1977). Italian.
Neo-Baroque??
Nicola Samori is fucking incredible. He works out of...
Tears for Fears
“Head Over Heels” (Live circa the mid-80s)
I heard this song in a store the other day and was reminded how brilliant it is – the...
This was the best part of the masters graduation experience, HANDS DOWN

There’s a lot of beauty in ordinary things. Isn’t that kind of the point?
Tonight’s power-through grading session brought to you by Paramore.