My Big, Gigantic Drum Kit
In sum, all of Raddatz’s questions were squarely within the extremely narrow - and highly ideological - DC consensus about US foreign policy generally and Iran specifically: namely, Iran is a national security threat to the US; it is trying to obtain nuclear weapons; the US must stop them; the US has the unchallenged right to suffocate Iranian civilians and attack militarily. As usual, the only question worth debating is whether a military attack on Iran now would be strategically wise, whether it would advance US interests.
One can say many things about the worldview promoted by her questions. That it is “objective” or free of ideology is most certainly not one of them.
Thank you, Parisa!
Next up, we’ll have a bit of change of format, similar to our recent Brazilian...
Edit: Haha, I wrote this whole thing and then I did a little search and rediscovered a very short thing I wrote about "Drunk in Love." But this...
Thank you, Brittney!
After we’ve previously had a look at David Bowie’s underrated output during the...